A Moment Not Worth Life Logging.

Welcome to 2008, everybody. I’m not sure how your year began, but ours started with an inaugural dance party in the sleet. 

Bob and Brooke are welcoming us to the new year with a clip of Chris Matthews freaking out about the results of the Iowa caucus. Which is not newsworthy. Chris Matthews is always freaking out about something. The whole epsiode is similarly bland and uneventful.

Apparently, in the new year, there’s more to freak out about than the presidential election. As we find out later in the episode, we eat like crap and there may be no new TV, indefinitely. 

But even more terrifying than the prospect of never seeing my beloved “Mad Men” again is the thought of Life Logging.

After a brief porn music interlude, Brooke introduces Gordon Bell, a software developer for Microsoft who is in the process of developing something called life logging. It’s the practice of keeping every tiny detail of one’s personal life stored on a hard drive. Dude is keeping track of every coffee cup and receipt, even going so far as to wear a camera around his neck that snaps a picture every minute. 

He takes all of these things and stores them on a hard drive, which serves as kind of a second brain. The logic is that a perfect memory preserved on a hard drive can supplement the imperfect memory of a real brain. Bell admits that he depends on his system, but he can quit. He can quit any time he wants. 

Though there are benefits (think of the way it could help amnesia patients), life logging is kinda creepy.

I don’t think I could ever do it – there are days that I want to forget, and there are definitely things in my past that I don’t ever want to think about again. Also, I kinda don’t want to see anyone else’s life log.

It seems like the quest to try to remember everything would get in the way of actually living. It seems like it would be an incredible distraction. Also, as the software developer notes, if one’s hard drive were to crash, it could be entirely psychologically devastating. 

In other news, Bob seems to be on his best behavior this week. I wonder if something happened over  the holiday that he’d rather forget. Or, maybe I was wrong about his raging crush. It could have just been a general sense of holiday goodwill towards everyone (especially Brooke). 

Posted by Kerry, edited by Matthew. 

Filed under: National Public Radio, On the Media, Recaps

The Christmas Special

Merry Christmas, public radio lovers!

Don’t you kind of wish you were at the NPR Christmas party? Take a second to imagine that – Carl Castle in a burgundy smoking jacket and slippers, padding around with a hotty toddy making sure everyone is having a good time, Ira Glass pretending he doesn’t notice that Terry Gross is totally trying to engage him in a flirtatious verbal sparring match. Brooke is totally standing by the punch, giggling with Renee Montagne and Michele Norris while Bob sulks over by the aluminum tree, trying to work up the nerve to give Brooke the mix tape that Bob Boilen helped him make.

(Matthew wishes he could get an invitation to this just to hang out with Sarah Vowell, and possibly, maybe, if he works up the nerve, ask her over to his house to watch High Fidelity.)

Alas, someone still has to read the news. This week’s On the Media is especially light. It’s like they got a memo right before taping that said “Hurry up and be journalists and get down here! Steve Inskeep brought a flask!”

The episode opens with some talk about campaign advertising. I’m not going to elaborate, because I know I’m going to be typing that sentence repeatedly until after the election.

The talk of advertising quickly leads to a discussion of factual accuracy. Brooke interviews Craig Silverman, the genius editor behind Regret The Error (link), a Web site that collects media errors and the correction blurbs that run in their wake. Every year, Silverman and his staff give an award to the Error of the Year. The winner this year? A photo that ran in all sorts of media (including Reuters) of the Russian mission to plant a flag at the bottom of the Arctic ocean turned out to be from the movie “Titanic.” The error was corrected by a teenager in Finland who had seen Titanic way too many times.

Brooke is totally enamored with this dude. Hell, I am, too. She’s giggling and cracking jokes, and I’m really hoping that after the interview, Silverman had enough sense to ask for her number.

All things considered, 2007’s errors weren’t nearly as catastrophic as last year’s. However, following a story on media coverage of the death penalty, Bob is quick to point out that 2007 has been an especially dangerous year to be a journalist.

Making the news is a tough business. This year, 64 journalists were killed in action, and 30 of those were Iraqi nationals. But there is a bright spot – for the first time in a long time, there were no journalists killed in Colombia.

After the carnage (mangled facts, botched executions, fallen comerades) of the first half of the episode, it’s a relief to get to the second half, which is all about that warm fuzzy feeling people get around the holidays, particularly when they watch cartoons.

A segment on the revolutionary “Charlie Brown’s Christmas” turns into a reminder that in the cartoons of the 1950’s, there was a sort of acceptance of difference that we just don’t really get anymore. Talking snowmen, a Jack-in-the-Box named Charlie, Rudolph, and other imperfect creatures are all able to celebrate Christmas together, in the warm glow of a claymation fire.

These cartoons are still relevant today. They’re classic, and every year, their ratings stay high. And yeah, people aren’t that idealistic anymore, but it’s that time of year when I kind of wish that we were. I want Rudolph to be accepted. I want errant facts corralled into their proper places. I want our very own Charlie Brown, Bob Garfield, to finally get the things he wants the most.

I want public radio to continue to make an emotional mess of me for years to come.

Happy holidays from the two of us at Radio Sweethearts. We hope you and your family have a really great one.

Now where’s Carl Castle? I think I need another drink.

Posted by Kerry, edited…*longing sigh* by Matthew.

Filed under: National Public Radio, On the Media, Public Radio International, Recaps , Bob, Brooke, Pointing Fingers

Whispering Sweet Nothings Directly Into My Brain

Today’s On the Media was all about mind control.

A segment on subliminal advertising opened with Bob saying “The word sex written in Ritz Crackers. Naked women in ice cubes.” That’s not subliminal advertising. That’s what Carl Castle calls “Monday”.

Bob interviews Mark Crispin Miller, who is a professor of media ecology. Though I’m not entirely sure what that means, I kind of want to be one. Apparently, when you’re a media ecologist, you are informed enough to go on NPR.

So you can forget what your pervy college psychology teacher told you, kids. Subliminal advertising isn’t real. Bob’s Brookelust, however, has never been subliminal.

Somehow, the fact that subliminal advertising doesn’t work doesn’t deter our radio Romeo. To quote Bob, “It doesn’t matter if they were able to seduce us subliminally. They were certainly willing to try.” Bob is all about getting the maximum amount of information. He’s taking an approach that’s usually only seen on Mythbusters. Sure, it doesn’t actually work, but Bob wants to know exactly what the conditions have to be in order for it to work.

If, you know, it could.

That could be why Brooke’s follow-up story is on advertisements that can talk to you in your head. I’m going to type that out one more time, in case you didn’t notice how scary the concept is. There are people who are making advertisements that, though the miracle of wireless transmission and radio waves and the transmitting power of the human skull, can talk to you IN YOUR BRAIN.

This technology can be used so that advertisers can direct highly focused messages to specific consumers. I can understand that. Other possible uses for this technology is in law enforcement and crowd control or in search-and-rescue situations. It can also be used in a fun way – kids could talk to each other in their brains! There are a lot of ethical implications here, most importantly that one’s thoughts are intensely private and this technology is has the most brazen potential for invasion of privacy.

Brooke is interested, and she wants to know more. This could be her cat-like journalistic prowess. Or, it could be her way of trying to find an effective combat weapon for Bob’s subliminal advances.

How will the mind control battle of the sexes turn out? Will Bob’s use of something that doesn’t exist be able to best Brooke’s ability to bend completely creepy new technologies to her will? Tune in next week, for more from the Radio Sweethearts.

This post was written by Kerry, and edited…by Matthew.

Filed under: National Public Radio, On the Media

On Her Media

Matthew and I were on the phone one night, discussing the latest episode of On The Media. The episode was pretty much the typical media watchdogging that we’ve come to expect: a long examination into the latest CIA report about Iran’s unsurprising lack of nuclear weapons and an in-depth look at the dire plight of the displaced Russian journalist (and his pet skunk).

The episode warranted discussion for one story in particular. Co-Host Bob Garfield has started a website called “Comcast Must Die.” And while I’m inclined to agree with him, I was a little concerned about the ethical ramifications of such a website when dude’s job is to report on media. Thankfully, the other host, Brooke Gladstone insisted that a story on Bob’s involvement in Comcast Must Die be run in the name of journalistic integrity and transparency.

Listen here.
Clearly, Brooke interviewed Bob only out of a sense of journalistic obligation.

Bob, however, sounded quite flustered.

The surprise–and pleasure–of being interviewed by Brooke appeared to be more than Bob’s broad shoulders could bear. Bob thanked Brooke for the interview, (quote?) but in a manner that betrayed an embarrassment born not of what might be an unseemly conflict of interest, but born instead from an intense and unrequited adolescent crush.

Post-interview, Bob gushed his thanks in a way that suggests that every time Brooke turns around, he’s right behind her, stealthily plucking the lint from her sweater to add to a DIY altar that sits in his bedroom.

Ever the chanteuse, Brooke shrugged off the adoration with a giggle that seems to imply that she’s heard it all before.

In the moment, it all made sense – Bob likes Brooke. In the pants. You can hear it, every week, when he ends the credits by sighing that the show was “edited… by Brooke.”

If this sordid love can play out every week, via radio and podcast, who knows what’s going on behind the scenes of other public radio shows we love?

This is why Radio Sweethearts is here–it is our mission to provide in-depth coverage of the probably hypothetical and potentially scandalous behind-the-scenes lives of the sexy voices that work in public radio.

It’s not all fast times at National Public High. There will be serious commentary on the best stories, most riveting reporting, and other aural goodies that can only be brought to you by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur foundation. And by Acura, whose all-new TL, I’ve heard, features four-wheel synergy drive.

This week’s episode was produced by the Radio Sweethearts team, written by Kerry, and edited… by Matthew.

Filed under: National Public Radio, Recaps , Bob, Brooke, Comcast